Designer dog breeds such as pugs, French bulldogs and English bulldogs could disappear from licensed UK breeding within a decade after the launch of a new innate health assessment. Coverage from Dailymail has highlighted this story.

The toolkit, called the innate health assessment (IHA), was unveiled in the UK on Tuesday by the All Party Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare (APGAW). Supporters say it is intended to tackle chronic ill-health linked to extreme conformations in dogs — traits that have become particularly associated with popular “designer” breeds — and that the IHA will give breeders, breed clubs and licensing authorities a new reference point for judging whether particular conformations should be permitted in licensed breeding.

https://x.com/nypost/status/1990821034237276593. Reporting by Yahoo offers additional detail on this case.

Professor Lord Trees, co-chairman of APGAW, described the toolkit at the launch as a direct contribution to improving canine welfare. “This tool is a valuable contribution to reducing the chronic ill-health associated with extreme conformations in dogs,” he said, framing the IHA as a practical step by a cross-party parliamentary group to influence how breeding policy and licensing are applied in the UK.

Dr. Dan O’Neill, associate professor of companion animal epidemiology at the Royal Veterinary College, set out the ambition behind the initiative in stark terms. “The plan here is that in 10 years time, there will not be a single dog bred in the UK by a licensed breeder that has any extreme conformation,” he said, linking the IHA to an expectation of substantial change in breeding outcomes if the assessment is taken up by regulators and breed authorities.

The IHA launch follows months of discussion among veterinary experts, welfare groups and parliamentary stakeholders about how to curb suffering associated with extreme physical traits. Media coverage of the rollout picked up on the stronger predictions about the future of popular breeds: outlets including Yahoo, the Daily Mail and Upworthy have reported on the potential for striking change in the next decade, with some headlines suggesting that the flat-faced breeds now favoured by many owners could be effectively phased out of licensed breeding. As covered by Snuggle Upworthy, readers can explore more context around the event.

The Kennel Club also weighed in on the broader principle behind the assessment. A Kennel Club spokesman said, “The Kennel Club is committed to the principle that all dogs should have a body shape that enables them to lead a good quality of life,” a position the organisation framed as compatible with efforts to protect canine welfare while preserving responsible breeding standards. The Kennel Club’s response emphasized alignment with the aim of safeguarding dogs’ quality of life rather than endorsing blanket bans on specific breeds.

PETA’s manager Jakob Shaw gave a sharper critique of the practices the IHA aims to curb. “People don’t realize that intentionally breeding dogs with flat faces, elongated backs, excessive wrinkles, and other deformities causes constant suffering, so any effort to end this cruel practice is a step in the right direction,” Shaw said, echoing long-standing calls from animal welfare organisations for stricter controls or outright bans on breeding dogs with intentionally deformed conformations.

Advocacy groups and industry voices offered contrasting perspectives at the launch and in the days that followed. Sandy Moore, chief executive officer of the Pet Advocacy Network, cautioned against alarmist headlines. “Claims that popular breeds will ‘disappear’ are alarmist and ignore the fact that these dogs live happy, healthy lives when bred responsibly,” Moore said, defending the role of responsible breeders and urging that change be proportionate and evidence-based.

The IHA was presented by APGAW amid a broader push to ensure licensing and breeding guidance better reflect contemporary veterinary evidence and welfare concerns. Supporters say the toolkit will help local licensing officers, breed clubs and regulators make clearer decisions about whether particular conformations are acceptable in licensed breeding. Critics, including some breed organisations and individual breeders, have argued that enforcement and interpretation could be contentious and that responsible breeding should not be conflated with the worst excesses seen in some lines.

The debate is not new: animal welfare groups, veterinary professionals and politicians have been discussing how to address the health consequences of selective breeding for many years. What the IHA does is translate that debate into a concrete instrument that backers hope will be adopted into licensing regimes and breed standards over time. Proponents point to the potential for a decade-long window to reshape breeding practices and reduce the prevalence of extreme conformations among dogs bred under a licensed framework.

The IHA launch on Tuesday marks the formal introduction of the toolkit into UK discussions about breeding standards and canine welfare. As the policy conversation moves from advocacy and scientific review to implementation, supporters argue the assessment can reduce chronic ill-health tied to extreme conformations; defenders of breeders urged caution about sweeping predictions; and welfare campaigners said the toolkit represents an important new lever to end practices they consider inherently cruel.

Source

Original reporting: view the original article.