Tulsa woman pays $500 to rescue severely neglected goldendoodle Daisy

On Oct. 23, 2025, Summer Ipock of Tulsa paid $500 to the owners of one of two neglected dogs to remove a severely neglected goldendoodle named Daisy from their care; Daisy is now receiving medical treatment.

Rescued goldendoodle with patchy fur sitting on a veterinary exam table, thin and alert, receiving care.

On Oct. 23, 2025, Tulsa resident Summer Ipock paid $500 to the owners of one of two neglected dogs to take custody of a goldendoodle named Daisy, according to reporting by People.com and other outlets. The move came after Ipock saw social media posts documenting Daisy’s condition and moved to secure the animal’s surrender when she located the dog in person. Coverage from People has highlighted this story.

Reporting describes Daisy as severely neglected: nearly bald, suffering from a skin infection and other health issues that required immediate veterinary attention. The dog was one of two animals in the home identified in the online post; coverage by Yahoo highlighted how dire Daisy’s physical state appeared in photos and videos shared on Facebook, prompting concern from community members and animal advocates.

Ipock told reporters she could not ignore what she had seen online and felt compelled to act. ‘Even though [the dog] Daisy was in terrible condition, I could tell it was a doodle — that I obviously have a soft spot for — and I couldn’t stop thinking about it,’ she said. After locating the dog on Oct. 23, Ipock negotiated with the owners and agreed to pay $500 to take Daisy into her care, removing the animal from the environment that had prompted the online post. Reporting by Yahoo offers additional detail on this case.

Local accounts indicate that animal control was notified about the alleged neglect but did not take action before Ipock intervened. The lack of immediate official enforcement left community members with limited options, according to the reporting, and that reality influenced Ipock’s decision to offer money in exchange for the dog’s surrender. ‘Sadly, I know that money talks, and I was just hopeful that since they obviously didn’t care about their dog, maybe they would care about money,’ she said.

Upon taking possession of Daisy, Ipock transferred the dog to the care of a private rescuer who arranged veterinary evaluation and treatment. Observers described Daisy’s movement and appearance as fragile — Ipock compared the dog’s ungainly gait to that of a young deer, saying, ‘She reminds me of Bambi because she has the skinny, long legs and is extremely clumsy.’ Media coverage emphasized the immediate need for medical attention to address the skin infection and other health concerns once Daisy was out of the home.

The reporting noted that Daisy’s coat was largely gone in places and that the skin infection appeared extensive in the images that circulated online. Those details spurred local concern and a flurry of messages and offers of help from people who saw the social posts. After the private rescuer took Daisy, the dog began receiving the veterinary care called for by those assessments, although outlets did not report a final prognosis or long-term outcome at the time of publication. As covered by Tulsaspca, readers can explore more context around the event.

Coverage of the rescue also called attention to local resources and the process for reporting suspected animal welfare violations. The Tulsa SPCA, which provides guidance on how residents can raise concerns about animal welfare, was cited as one place people can learn more about reporting and intervention options. However, reporting on this incident stressed that, in this case, community members stepped in directly because they felt formal responses had been insufficient or delayed.

The original social-media post that drew attention to Daisy identified two dogs at the property, and reporting clarified that Daisy was the animal in the more severe condition. Ipock’s intervention focused specifically on removing Daisy and arranging care; the public record available in the coverage did not indicate whether the other dog was surrendered, removed, or later treated by authorities or owners.

Ipock framed her actions as an example for others who encounter signs of animal neglect or abuse online or in person. ‘If people take anything from this, I hope it’s that if you see something, say something,’ she said, urging bystanders to report concerns and, when possible, to support rescues and veterinary care for animals in need. She acknowledged the imperfect circumstances that sometimes lead people who see neglect to take matters into their own hands, but described her choice as an attempt to get Daisy the help she urgently required.

Reporting on the case drew from interviews with Ipock, photographs and videos posted on social media, and follow-up details from outlets such as People and Yahoo. The coverage focused on how a concerned individual located the dog after seeing a public post, negotiated a surrender, and then placed the animal into a private rescuer’s care so that veterinarians could begin addressing the visible medical issues.

Source

Original reporting: view the original article.

Comments are closed.